The People v. Spector

192 N.E.2d 926, 28 Ill. 2d 554, 1963 Ill. LEXIS 569
CourtIllinois Supreme Court
DecidedSeptember 27, 1963
Docket37594
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 192 N.E.2d 926 (The People v. Spector) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
The People v. Spector, 192 N.E.2d 926, 28 Ill. 2d 554, 1963 Ill. LEXIS 569 (Ill. 1963).

Opinion

Mr. Chief Justice Klingbiel

delivered the opinion of the court:

After a bench trial in the criminal court of Cook County Ralph Spector and Sam Testa were found to have violated the conspiracy statute. (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1959, chap. 38, par. 139.) Each was sentenced to the penitentiary, Spector for a term of one to five years and Testa for a term of one to three years. Contending that the evidence fails to establish guilt, they seek direct review by writ of error in this court.

The Criminal Code directs that “Appeals from and writs of error to Circuit Courts, the Superior Court of Cook County, the Criminal Court of Cook County, County Courts and City Courts, in all criminal cases below the grade of felony shall be taken directly to the Appellate Court, and in all criminal cases above the grade of misdemeanors, shall be taken directly to the Supreme Court.” (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1959, chap. 38, par. 780JL) The statute which defendants were convicted of violating prescribes punishment in part by a penitentiary sentence and in part by fine as one of the penalties. It provides that offenders “shall be fined not exceeding $2,000 or shall be imprisoned in the county jail not exceeding one year, or shall be imprisoned in the penitentiary for a term of not less than one year and not exceeding five years, or may be so fined and so imprisoned in the county jail or penitentiary.” Ill. Rev. Stat. 1959, chap. 38, par. 139.

When an offense may be punished by imprisonment in the penitentiary, or by fine only, or by imprisonment in the penitentiary and by fine, in the discretion of the court or jury, it is only a misdemeanor. (People v. Bain, 359 Ill. 455 ; Herman v. People, 131 Ill. 594.) Thus the conspiracy defined by the section in question is below the grade of felony, and a writ of error can be sued out of the Appellate Court only. People v. Basuris, 360 Ill. 192.

There are no constitutional questions involved in the review sought (cf. People v. Beeftink, 21 Ill.2d 282), nor is there any other question present giving this court jurisdiction for direct review. The cause will therefore be transferred to the Appellate Court for the First District.

Cause transferred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Latham
385 F. Supp. 57 (E.D. Illinois, 1974)
Bruni v. Department of Registration & Education
319 N.E.2d 37 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1974)
People v. Prather
306 N.E.2d 361 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1974)
People v. McCollough
291 N.E.2d 505 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1972)
Bruni v. Department of Registration & Education
290 N.E.2d 295 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1972)
The PEOPLE v. Hise
272 N.E.2d 264 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1971)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
192 N.E.2d 926, 28 Ill. 2d 554, 1963 Ill. LEXIS 569, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/the-people-v-spector-ill-1963.