The People v. Sparkle Daniel
This text of The People v. Sparkle Daniel (The People v. Sparkle Daniel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This memorandum is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the New York Reports. -----------------------------------------------------------------
No. 117 The People &c., Appellant, v. Sparkle Daniel, Respondent.
David P. Stromes, for appellant. Natalie Rea, for respondent.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Appeal dismissed upon the ground that the reversal by the Appellate Division was not "on the law alone or upon the law and such facts which, but for the determination of law, would not have led to reversal" (CPL 450.90[2][a]). Chief Judge DiFiore and Judges Pigott, Rivera, Abdus-Salaam, Stein, Fahey and Garcia concur.
Decided June 30, 2016
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
The People v. Sparkle Daniel, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/the-people-v-sparkle-daniel-ny-2016.