The People v. Sergio Del Rosario

CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedDecember 22, 2020
Docket89
StatusPublished

This text of The People v. Sergio Del Rosario (The People v. Sergio Del Rosario) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
The People v. Sergio Del Rosario, (N.Y. 2020).

Opinion

State of New York MEMORANDUM Court of Appeals This memorandum is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the New York Reports.

No. 89 The People &c., Respondent, v. Sergio Del Rosario, Appellant.

Debra A. Cassidy, for appellant. Christine DiSalvo, for respondent.

MEMORANDUM:

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, without costs. Under the

circumstances presented here, we reject the People’s argument that defendant’s appeal is

rendered moot by his deportation (see People v Perez, 33 NY3d 1008 [2020]). On the

-1- -2- No. 89

merits, we conclude that it was not an abuse of discretion for the Appellate Division to

sustain the upward departure based on the People’s proof that defendant raped the victim

in order to take revenge upon someone other than the victim—a risk factor not adequately

captured by the Guidelines.

Order affirmed, without costs, in a memorandum. Judges Rivera, Stein, Fahey, Garcia, Wilson and Feinman concur. Chief Judge DiFiore took no part.

Decided December 22, 2020

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
The People v. Sergio Del Rosario, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/the-people-v-sergio-del-rosario-ny-2020.