The People v. Robert L. Ingram
This text of The People v. Robert L. Ingram (The People v. Robert L. Ingram) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This memorandum is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the New York Reports. ----------------------------------------------------------------- No. 235 SSM 24 The People &c., Appellant, v. Robert L. Ingram, Respondent.
Submitted by David A. Heraty, for appellant. Submitted by Sherry A. Chase, for respondent.
MEMORANDUM: The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed. The determination as to whether police have reasonable
- 1 - - 2 - SSM No. 24
suspicion to justify a stop involves a mixed question of law and fact (People v Woods, 98 NY2d 627, 628 [2002]). Where, as here, there exists record support for the Appellate Division's resolution of this question, the issue is beyond this Court's further review. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules, order affirmed, in a memorandum. Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Read, Smith, Pigott, Rivera and Abdus-Salaam concur.
Decided December 16, 2014
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
The People v. Robert L. Ingram, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/the-people-v-robert-l-ingram-ny-2014.