The People v. Ricardo Ricketts

CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedSeptember 8, 2016
Docket210 SSM 20
StatusPublished

This text of The People v. Ricardo Ricketts (The People v. Ricardo Ricketts) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
The People v. Ricardo Ricketts, (N.Y. 2016).

Opinion

This memorandum is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the New York Reports. -----------------------------------------------------------------

No. 210 SSM 20 The People &c., Respondent, v. Ricardo Ricketts, Appellant.

Submitted by Denise A. Corsi, for appellant. Submitted by Michael Brenner, for respondent.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed. Defendant's sole argument, concerning whether the trial court followed the proper procedure for permitting witnesses to testify anonymously, is unpreserved for our review. Chief Judge DiFiore and Judges Pigott, Rivera, Abdus-Salaam, Stein, Fahey and Garcia concur.

Decided September 8, 2016

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
The People v. Ricardo Ricketts, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/the-people-v-ricardo-ricketts-ny-2016.