The PEOPLE v. Rauschenberg
This text of 179 N.E.2d 13 (The PEOPLE v. Rauschenberg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court: Dolores Rauschenberg and Frank Kreigl, two of three defendants, were convicted of resisting an officer in the county court of Du Page County. Their motions for a new trial and in arrest of judgment were overruled, and judgments were entered on the verdicts. They sued out a writ of error to the Appellate Court, Second District, which affirmed the judgment of the county court. (29 Ill. App. 2d 293.) They are here on a further writ of error to review their conviction.
Each of defendants’ assignments of error in this court were fully considered and resolved adversely to them in the Appellate Court. We concur with the determination of the Appellate Court, and its opinion is adopted as the opinion of this court.
T t,Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
179 N.E.2d 13, 23 Ill. 2d 511, 1961 Ill. LEXIS 537, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/the-people-v-rauschenberg-ill-1961.