The People v. Ortega

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in The People v. Ortega. Read the opinion of the Court — 218 Cal. App. 4th 1418
California Court of Appeal·Decided August 26, 2013·No. E054882M·Published

Opinion

Filed 8/26/13

CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent, E054882

v. (Super.Ct.No. RIF105398)

ENRIQUE ORTEGA, ORDER MODIFYING OPINION

Defendant and Appellant. [NO CHANGE IN JUDGMENT]

THE COURT

It is ordered that the opinion filed herein on August 21, 2013, be modified as

follows. The third full sentence on page 16 is modified to add the word “not” before the

word “allege” so the sentence reads as follows:

The court held that the amended pleadings did not allege the “same conduct” as the

original pleading and therefore did not relate back. Except for this modification, the opinion remains unchanged. This modification

does not effect a change in judgment.

RICHLI J. We concur:

HOLLENHORST Acting P. J.

McKINSTER J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The People v. Ortega, (Cal. Ct. App. 2013).

The People v. Ortega (The People v. Ortega) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.