The People v. Nadine Panton

New York Court of Appeals

The People v. Nadine Panton

57 N.E.3d 1095, 27 N.Y.3d 1144

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedJune 30, 2016

Docket118

StatusPublished

Cited by9 cases

This text of 57 N.E.3d 1095 (The People v. Nadine Panton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

The People v. Nadine Panton, 57 N.E.3d 1095, 27 N.Y.3d 1144 (N.Y. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

Defendant contends that police engaged in improper pre- Miranda custodial interrogation and, as a result, her post- *1145 Miranda written and video statements should have been suppressed. Because defendant did not raise this particular ground either in her suppression motion or at the hearing, it is unpre-served for our review (see People v Gonzalez, 55 NY2d 887, 888 [1982]).

We have considered defendant’s remaining contention and find it to be without merit.

Chief Judge DiFiore and Judges Pigott, Rivera, Abdus-Salaam, Stein, Fahey and Garcia concur.

Order affirmed, in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI