The People v. Karen M. Caza
This text of The People v. Karen M. Caza (The People v. Karen M. Caza) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
================================================================= This memorandum is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the New York Reports. ----------------------------------------------------------------- No. 231 SSM 23 The People &c., Respondent, v. Karen M. Caza, Appellant.
Submitted by Martin J. McGuinness, for appellant. Respondent, precluded.
MEMORANDUM: The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed. Defendant's argument that County Court erred in enhancing her sentence by departing from its conditional promise to make her two terms of imprisonment run concurrently, is unpreserved for
- 1 - - 2 - SSM No. 23
our review (see CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Hawkins, 11 NY3d 484, 491-493 [2008]). * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules, order affirmed, in a memorandum. Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott, Rivera and Abdus-Salaam concur.
Decided November 20, 2014
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
The People v. Karen M. Caza, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/the-people-v-karen-m-caza-ny-2014.