The People v. Juan Johnson
This text of The People v. Juan Johnson (The People v. Juan Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
State of New York Court of Appeals This memorandum is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the New York Reports.
No. 32 SSM 34 The People &c., Respondent, v. Juan Johnson, Appellant.
Submitted by Alice R. B. Cullina, for appellant. Submitted by Andrew S. Durham, for respondent.
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules, order reversed and case remitted to the Appellate Division, Second Department, for further proceedings. Under the totality of the circumstances and upon the People's concession that the appeal waiver was invalid because the plea court conflated the right to appeal with those rights automatically forfeited by a guilty plea, defendant's appeal waiver did not foreclose consideration of his suppression claim (see People v Moyett, 7 NY3d 892, 892-893 [2006]). Chief Judge DiFiore and Judges Rivera, Garcia, Wilson, Singas, Cannataro and Troutman concur.
Decided February 10, 2022
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
The People v. Juan Johnson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/the-people-v-juan-johnson-ny-2022.