The People v. Jeffrey Mercado

New York Court of Appeals·Decided March 26, 2015·No. 100 SSM 4·Published

Opinion

================================================================= This memorandum is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the New York Reports. ----------------------------------------------------------------- No. 100 SSM 4 The People &c., Respondent,

v.

Jeffrey Mercado, Appellant.

Submitted by Claudia Flores, for appellant. Submitted by Allen J. Vickey, for respondent.

MEMORANDUM:

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed. The determinations regarding founded suspicion of criminality justifying a request to search the car, and then the trunk, and defendant's consent to a search of the vehicle, all involve mixed questions of law and fact. The determinations are supported by

- 2 - No. SSM 4

the record, and are beyond further review (see People v Valerio, 95 NY2d 924, 925 [2000]). * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules, order affirmed, in a memorandum. Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Read, Pigott, Rivera, Abdus-Salaam, Stein and Fahey concur.

Decided March 26, 2015

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The People v. Jeffrey Mercado, (N.Y. 2015).

The People v. Jeffrey Mercado (The People v. Jeffrey Mercado) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Valerio
744 N.E.2d 136 (New York Court of Appeals, 2000)