The People v. Jeffrey Mercado
Opinion
================================================================= This memorandum is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the New York Reports. ----------------------------------------------------------------- No. 100 SSM 4 The People &c., Respondent,
v.
Jeffrey Mercado, Appellant.
Submitted by Claudia Flores, for appellant. Submitted by Allen J. Vickey, for respondent.
MEMORANDUM:
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed. The determinations regarding founded suspicion of criminality justifying a request to search the car, and then the trunk, and defendant's consent to a search of the vehicle, all involve mixed questions of law and fact. The determinations are supported by
- 2 - No. SSM 4
the record, and are beyond further review (see People v Valerio, 95 NY2d 924, 925 [2000]). * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules, order affirmed, in a memorandum. Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Read, Pigott, Rivera, Abdus-Salaam, Stein and Fahey concur.
Decided March 26, 2015
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
The People v. Jeffrey Mercado (The People v. Jeffrey Mercado) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.