The People v. James M. Roshia, Jr.

CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedOctober 20, 2016
Docket217 SSM 19
StatusPublished

This text of The People v. James M. Roshia, Jr. (The People v. James M. Roshia, Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
The People v. James M. Roshia, Jr., (N.Y. 2016).

Opinion

This memorandum is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the New York Reports. ----------------------------------------------------------------- No. 217 SSM 19 The People &c., Respondent, v. James M. Roshia, Jr. Appellant.

Submitted by Albert F. Lawrence, for appellant. Submitted by Alexander Lesyk, Esq., for respondent.

MEMORANDUM: The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed. Defendant was indicted by a grand jury, a sexual assault evidence kit was taken from the victim, and County Court's order directing defendant to provide a DNA sample was authorized by statute (CPL 240.40[2][b][v]). Accordingly, County Court did not err in

- 1 - - 2 - SSM 19

granting the People's application directing defendant to provide a buccal swab for testing. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules, order affirmed, in a memorandum. Chief Judge DiFiore and Judges Pigott, Rivera, Abdus-Salaam, Stein, Fahey and Garcia concur.

Decided October 20, 2016

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
The People v. James M. Roshia, Jr., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/the-people-v-james-m-roshia-jr-ny-2016.