The People v. James Ball
This text of The People v. James Ball (The People v. James Ball) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
State of New York Court of Appeals This memorandum is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the New York Reports.
No. 65 SSM 7 The People &c., Appellant, v. James Ball, Respondent.
Submitted by Kenneth H. Tyler, Jr., for appellant. Submitted by John A. Cirando, for respondent.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules, order affirmed, for reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (see People v Ball, 175 AD3d 987 [4th Dept 2019]). Chief Judge DiFiore and Judges Rivera, Stein, Fahey, Garcia, Wilson and Feinman concur.
Decided June 9, 2020
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
The People v. James Ball, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/the-people-v-james-ball-ny-2020.