The People v. Cliffton Fletcher

New York Court of Appeals·Decided August 25, 2016·No. 188 SSM 10·Published

Opinion

This memorandum is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the New York Reports. ----------------------------------------------------------------- No. 188 SSM 10 The People &c, Respondent, v. Cliffton Fletcher, Appellant.

Submitted by Dina Zloczower, for appellant. Submitted by Howard B. Goodman, for respondent.

MEMORANDUM: The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed. Whether the circumstances of this particular case gave rise to reasonable suspicion presents a mixed question of law and fact that is beyond our review if there is support in the record for the determination (see People v William, 19 NY3d 891, 893 [2012];

- 1 - - 2 - SSM No. 10

People v Pines, 99 NY2d 525, 527 [2002]). Here, such record support exists. Defendant's remaining argument has been considered and found to be lacking in merit. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed, in a memorandum. Chief Judge DiFiore and Judges Pigott, Rivera, Abdus-Salaam, Stein, Fahey and Garcia concur.

Decided August 25, 2016

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The People v. Cliffton Fletcher, (N.Y. 2016).

The People v. Cliffton Fletcher (The People v. Cliffton Fletcher) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Pines
782 N.E.2d 62 (New York Court of Appeals, 2002)
People v. William
971 N.E.2d 859 (New York Court of Appeals, 2012)