The People v. Anthony C.

CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedMarch 31, 2015
Docket101 SSM 2
StatusPublished

This text of The People v. Anthony C. (The People v. Anthony C.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
The People v. Anthony C., (N.Y. 2015).

Opinion

This memorandum is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the New York Reports. ----------------------------------------------------------------- No. 101 SSM 2 The People &c., Respondent, v. Anthony C., Appellant.

David J. Klem, for appellant. Susan Gliner, for respondent.

MEMORANDUM:

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed. The Appellate Division opinion does not suggest a misapprehension

- 1 - - 2 - SSM 2

or misapplication of its authority to review Youthful Offender adjudications for abuse of discretion (CPL 720.20 [1] [a]), or under its broad interest-of-justice jurisdiction (see CPL 470.15 [6] [b]; People v Dawn Maria C., 67 NY2d 625, 627 [1986]). * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules, order affirmed, in a memorandum. Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Read, Pigott, Rivera, Abdus-Salaam, Stein and Fahey concur.

Decided March 31, 2015

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Dawn Maria C.
490 N.E.2d 530 (New York Court of Appeals, 1986)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
The People v. Anthony C., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/the-people-v-anthony-c-ny-2015.