The People v. Alex Perez
This text of The People v. Alex Perez (The People v. Alex Perez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
State of New York MEMORANDUM Court of Appeals This memorandum is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the New York Reports.
No. 45 SSM 5 The People &c., Respondent, v. Alex Perez, Appellant.
Submitted by Matthew C. Hug, for appellant. Submitted by Emily Schultz, for respondent.
MEMORANDUM:
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed. Any error was harmless
because, in the circumstances presented, the proof of defendant’s guilt was overwhelming,
even after excising the disputed evidence. Further, no reasonable possibility exists that
-1- -2- SSM No. 5
admission of that evidence contributed to defendant’s conviction (see People v Mairena,
34 NY3d 473, 484-485 [2019]; People v Crimmins, 36 NY2d 230, 237, 241-242 [1975]).
Defendant’s arguments concerning the weight of the evidence and the harshness of his
sentence are not reviewable, and his other assertions are unavailing.
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules, order affirmed, in a memorandum. Chief Judge DiFiore and Judges Rivera, Stein, Fahey, Garcia and Wilson concur.
Decided March 30, 2021
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
The People v. Alex Perez, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/the-people-v-alex-perez-ny-2021.