The People of the State of California v. Ejuicesteals.com and Remon Hanna

E.D. California

The People of the State of California v. Ejuicesteals.com and Remon Hanna

DecidedSeptember 9, 2025

Docket1:23-cv-01726

StatusUnknown

This text of The People of the State of California v. Ejuicesteals.com and Remon Hanna (The People of the State of California v. Ejuicesteals.com and Remon Hanna) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

The People of the State of California v. Ejuicesteals.com and Remon Hanna, (E.D. Cal. 2025).

Pincite

Opinion

2 3

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11 THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF Case No. 1:23-cv-01726-KES-CDB

CALIFORNIA, 12 ORDER DISCHARGING SEPTEMBER 3, 13 Plaintiff, 2025, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE v. 14 (Docs. 47, 49) EJUICESTEALS.COM and REMON 15 HANNA, 16 Defendants. 17 18 On December 14, 2023, Plaintiff, the People of the State of California (“Plaintiff”) initiated 19 this action with the filing of a complaint against Defendants Ejuicesteals.com (“Ejuicesteals”) and 20 Remon Hanna (collectively, “Defendants”). (Doc. 1). 21 On September 2 2025, service of an order of the Court dated August 25, 2025, order (Doc. 22 44) was made by mail on Defendants Hanna and Ejuicesteals.com at their record address, which 23 is the same address listed in Defendant Hanna’s most recently filed status report (Doc. 45)— Luxor 24 Vape Distro, 2882 Walnut Ave, Tustin, CA 92780—but was returned by the U.S. Postal Service 25 as “Undeliverable, Attempted – Not Known, Unable to Forward.” See Dkt. 09/02/2025. An earlier 26 order of the Court and a docket entry made by the Clerk of the Court also were returned 27 undeliverable. Id. On September 3, 2025, the Court ordered Defendant Hanna to show cause in 28 writing within seven (7) days of the date of service of the order why sanctions should not be 1 | imposed for his failure to keep the Court apprised of his current address and to comply with the 2 | Local Rules. (Doc. 47). Defendant Hanna was provided the opportunity to comply with the order 3 | to show cause in the alternative filing by that same deadline a notice of change of address. □□□ at 4 | 4. 5 Pending before the Court is Defendant Hanna’s timely filing of a notice of change of 6 | address, filed on September 8, 2025. (Doc. 49). Defendant Hanna apologizes for the untimely 7 | failure to update his address. Id. 8 Based on Defendant Hanna’s compliance with the Court’s order to show cause by timely 9 | filing a notice of change of address, the Court find good cause to discharge the September 3, 2025, 10 || order to show cause (Doc. 47) without the imposition of sanctions. See In re Veritas Software 11 | Corp. Sec. Litig., 496 F.3d 962, 973 (9th Cir. 2007). 12 Conclusion and Order 13 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, the September 3, 2025, order to show cause 14 | (Doc. 47) is DISCHARGED without imposition of sanctions. | Tr Is SO ORDERED. 16 | } ) Bo Dated: _ September 9, 2025 17 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

2 3

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11 THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF Case No. 1:23-cv-01726-KES-CDB

CALIFORNIA, 12 ORDER DISCHARGING SEPTEMBER 3, 13 Plaintiff, 2025, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE v. 14 (Docs. 47, 49) EJUICESTEALS.COM and REMON 15 HANNA, 16 Defendants. 17 18 On December 14, 2023, Plaintiff, the People of the State of California (“Plaintiff”) initiated 19 this action with the filing of a complaint against Defendants Ejuicesteals.com (“Ejuicesteals”) and 20 Remon Hanna (collectively, “Defendants”). (Doc. 1). 21 On September 2 2025, service of an order of the Court dated August 25, 2025, order (Doc. 22 44) was made by mail on Defendants Hanna and Ejuicesteals.com at their record address, which 23 is the same address listed in Defendant Hanna’s most recently filed status report (Doc. 45)— Luxor 24 Vape Distro, 2882 Walnut Ave, Tustin, CA 92780—but was returned by the U.S. Postal Service 25 as “Undeliverable, Attempted – Not Known, Unable to Forward.” See Dkt. 09/02/2025. An earlier 26 order of the Court and a docket entry made by the Clerk of the Court also were returned 27 undeliverable. Id. On September 3, 2025, the Court ordered Defendant Hanna to show cause in 28 writing within seven (7) days of the date of service of the order why sanctions should not be 1 | imposed for his failure to keep the Court apprised of his current address and to comply with the 2 | Local Rules. (Doc. 47). Defendant Hanna was provided the opportunity to comply with the order 3 | to show cause in the alternative filing by that same deadline a notice of change of address. □□□ at 4 | 4. 5 Pending before the Court is Defendant Hanna’s timely filing of a notice of change of 6 | address, filed on September 8, 2025. (Doc. 49). Defendant Hanna apologizes for the untimely 7 | failure to update his address. Id. 8 Based on Defendant Hanna’s compliance with the Court’s order to show cause by timely 9 | filing a notice of change of address, the Court find good cause to discharge the September 3, 2025, 10 || order to show cause (Doc. 47) without the imposition of sanctions. See In re Veritas Software 11 | Corp. Sec. Litig., 496 F.3d 962, 973 (9th Cir. 2007). 12 Conclusion and Order 13 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, the September 3, 2025, order to show cause 14 | (Doc. 47) is DISCHARGED without imposition of sanctions. | Tr Is SO ORDERED. 16 | } ) Bo Dated: _ September 9, 2025 17 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

The People of the State of California v. Ejuicesteals.com and Remon Hanna, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/the-people-of-the-state-of-california-v-ejuicestealscom-and-remon-hanna-caed-2025.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack