The Patterson Tool Supply Co. v. Kemper

Ohio Supreme Court

The Patterson Tool Supply Co. v. Kemper

186 N.E. 92, 125 Ohio St. 632, 125 Ohio St. (N.S.) 632, 1932 Ohio LEXIS 300

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedApril 20, 1932

Docket23094, 23095 and 23096

StatusPublished

This text of 186 N.E. 92 (The Patterson Tool Supply Co. v. Kemper) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

The Patterson Tool Supply Co. v. Kemper, 186 N.E. 92, 125 Ohio St. 632, 125 Ohio St. (N.S.) 632, 1932 Ohio LEXIS 300 (Ohio 1932).

Pincite

Opinion

Without detailing the involved and unusual proceedings in the trial court wherein plaintiff in error sought to vacate judgments rendered against it therein, suffice it to say that the motions to vacate were fully presented to the trial court upon the statements of counsel and the evidence and were determined adversely to the plaintiff in error. Upon examination of the entire records we are unable to find that the trial court committed prejudicial error in overruling the motions to vacate. On consideration whereof it is therefore ordered and adjudged by this court that the judgments of the said Court of Appeals, affirming the trial court, be and the same are hereby affirmed.

Judgments affirmed.

Marshall, C. J., Jones, Matthias, Day, Allen, Kinkade and Stephenson, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Without detailing the involved and unusual proceedings in the trial court wherein plaintiff in error sought to vacate judgments rendered against it therein, suffice it to say that the motions to vacate were fully presented to the trial court upon the statements of counsel and the evidence and were determined adversely to the plaintiff in error. Upon examination of the entire records we are unable to find that the trial court committed prejudicial error in overruling the motions to vacate. On consideration whereof it is therefore ordered and adjudged by this court that the judgments of the said Court of Appeals, affirming the trial court, be and the same are hereby affirmed.

Judgments affirmed.

Marshall, C. J., Jones, Matthias, Day, Allen, Kinkade and Stephenson, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

186 N.E. 92, 125 Ohio St. 632, 125 Ohio St. (N.S.) 632, 1932 Ohio LEXIS 300, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/the-patterson-tool-supply-co-v-kemper-ohio-1932.