The Panaghia Kathariotisa

165 F.2d 430, 1948 U.S. App. LEXIS 1928, 1948 A.M.C. 461
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit
DecidedJanuary 9, 1948
DocketNo. 9582
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 165 F.2d 430 (The Panaghia Kathariotisa) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
The Panaghia Kathariotisa, 165 F.2d 430, 1948 U.S. App. LEXIS 1928, 1948 A.M.C. 461 (3d Cir. 1948).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The libellant in a possessory suit in admiralty, in which the Steamship Panaghia Kathariotisa has been arrested and is now in the custody of the United States Marshal, appeals from an order of the district court directing that upon the filing of a stipulation in the amount of $125,000 a writ shall issue to restore the steamship to the claimant, Andreas G. Caravias. At the outset we are confronted with a motion by the claimant, appearing specially, to dismiss the appeal upon the ground that the order in question is a non-appealable interlocutory order.

The motion to dismiss must be denied. The result of the order appealed from is to release the steamship from arrest. This in effect terminates the proceeding as against her and puts it out of the power of the district court to give the libellant that possession of the vessel to which he is entitled if he prevails. The Daisy, D.C.Mass., 1886, 29 F. 300. The order thus ends the suit for possessory relief as effectually as if it formally dismissed the libel. The Attualita, 4 Cir., 1916, 238 F. 909; The Pesaro, 1921, 255 U.S. 216, 41 S.Ct. 308, 65 L.Ed. 592.

Upon consideration of the libel and of the affidavits filed by the parties we are satisfied that retention by the court of possession of the vessel, pending the determination of the parties’ rights in her, is peculiarly imperative in this case because of its extraordinary circumstances. Accordingly we will reverse the order appealed from and will direct that the libel be set down for hearing and decision on the merits at the earliest convenient time. 2 Benedict on Admiralty, 6th Ed., p. 613.

It will be so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In the Matter of Kingstate Oil v. M/v Green Star. (Two Cases) Drew Ameroid International Corp. v. M/v Green Star, Her Engines, Boilers, Tackle, Etc., in Rem, and Kukje Shipping Company Limited, in Personam. (Two Cases) B.P. Oil International Limited v. Kuk-Je Shipping Co., Ltd. (Two Cases) Atlantic Steamers Supply Co. (n.j.) Incorporated v. M/v Green Star, Her Engines, Boilers, Tackle, Etc., in Rem and Kukje Shipping Company Limited, in Personam. (Two Cases) McAllister Brothers, Inc. v. M/v Green Star, Her Engines, Boilers, Tackle, Etc., in Rem, and Kukje Shipping Company Limited, in Personam. (Two Cases) Overseas Shipping, Inc. v. M/v Green Star, Her Engines, Boilers, Tackle, Etc., in Rem, and Kukje Shipping Company Limited, in Personam. (Two Cases) M.J. Rudolph Corp. v. M/v Green Star, Her Engines, Boilers, Tackle, Etc., in Rem, and Kukje Shipping Company Limited, in Personam. (Two Cases) Kingstate Oil and Bank of Pusan, in Intervention v. Kuk Je Shipping Company Limited, in Personam, and M/v Green Star, in Rem, in Intervention. (Two Cases) Witte Chase Corporation v. M/v Green Star, Her Engines, Boilers, Tackle, Etc., in Rem, and Kukje Shipping Company Limited, in Personam. (Two Cases) Kingstate Oil, Jung Jin Park, Young Ho Kim, Bag Myeong In, Bong Hun Jeong, Nam Sung Hyun, Gyo Seob Gim, I Seung Dae, Park Hong Min, Hong Samyoung, Gu Yeong Hund, Byum Sung Duk, Kim Jung Kei, Kim Tae Ok, Kim Haeng Sam, Kim Jung Bok, Kang Mai Mook, Lee Gab Yeol, Lee Kim Mun, Jung Gweon Park, Jeon Dae Yun, Byen Tto Sik, Jeon Su Saeng, Lee Hyeong Jo and Kim Su Han, in Intervention v. M/v Green Star, Her Engines, Boilers, Tackle, Appurtenances, Cargo, Etc., in Rem, and Kukje Shipping Company Ltd., in Personam. (Two Cases) Drew Ameroid International Corp. And Eklof Marine Corp., Intervening v. M/v Green Star, Her Engines, Boilers, Tackle, Etc., in Rem, and Kukje Shipping Company Limited, in Personam. (Two Cases) Drew Ameroid International Corp. And Korean Development Bank, Intervening v. M/v Green Star, Her Engines, Boilers, Tackle, Etc., in Rem, and Kukje Shipping Company Limited, in Personam. (Two Cases) Kingstate Oil and Nissho Iwai American Corp., in Intervention v. Kukje Shipping Company Limited, in Personam, and M/v Green Star, in Rem. (Two Cases) Kingstate Oil, Kim Hyun Jin, Kim Su Hwan, Nam Gungggyu, Kim Tae Gyu, Kim Byeong Ho, Mun Jeong Sook, Han Bong Chil, Seo Jae Gwan, Chang Ki Chang, Lee Chun Kil, Kang Byeong Jun, Bark Jong Cheol, Kim Sang Yul, O Yong-Hwan, Lee Hong Sik, Lee Myeong Deuk, Deo Imgyo, Park Yong Sun, Kim Sang Hwan, Kim Uk Kon, Chae Pil Kwen, Choi Yong Hwa, Jung Yong Gwan, Choi Hae Weon, Chun Jin Sik, Cha Yong Jin, Jo Yong Su, Chow Sung Yong, Kim Weon Joon, Chung Chung Hak, Lee Sei Hyang, Kim Chang Sea, Lee Nam Yong, Lee Bong Il, Lee Mun Yong, Jin Jae Chul, Kim Sung Hong, Ko Yong Bo, Lee Jae Gu, Kim Dae Jeon, Hong Soun Baek, Lee Sang Ik, Im Man Dae, Lee Sang Chun, and Kim Bum Qyu, Intervening v. M/v Green Star, Her Engines, Boilers, Tackle Appurtenances, Cargo, Etc., in Rem, and Kukje Shipping Company, Ltd., in Personam. (Two Cases) Great Ocean Supply Co., Inc. v. M/v Green Star, Her Engines, Boilers, Tackle, Etc., in Rem, and Kukje Shipping Company Limited, in Personam. (Two Cases) Appeal of Bank of Pusan, in Intervention, in No. 86-5685. Appeal of Nissho Iwai American Corporation in No. 86-5712
815 F.2d 918 (Third Circuit, 1987)
Kingstate Oil v. M/V Green Star
815 F.2d 918 (Third Circuit, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
165 F.2d 430, 1948 U.S. App. LEXIS 1928, 1948 A.M.C. 461, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/the-panaghia-kathariotisa-ca3-1948.