The Ottawa

18 F. Cas. 908, 1 Low. 274
CourtDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts
DecidedJuly 15, 1868
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 18 F. Cas. 908 (The Ottawa) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Massachusetts primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
The Ottawa, 18 F. Cas. 908, 1 Low. 274 (D. Mass. 1868).

Opinion

LOWELL, District Judge.

The amount of salvage has been agreed, and the particulars of the distribution are not submitted to me; but the questions which are submitted are questions of distribution. It is the general rule in salvage that all persons aiding in the service, however slightly, are salvors. The exceptions are when the services are insignificant and hardly amount to personal exertion, such as sending other men to work, and the like. This case appears to fall within the general rule. Mr. Smith performed some part of the work, and aided in giving the notice and information. Although he did not go off to the vessel on the second day, and gave no personal assistance in saving her, but only in the rescue of her tackle and apparel, yet the evidence shows clearly that many of those who did go from the shore, and who are properly joined in the libel, were not needed, and that several of them in fact performed no work at all, excepting such as Smith did in saving the materials. Indeed, there was little to be done by the men from Cuttyhunk on the second day, except to get up the anchor, and get out and make fast the tow-line.

The great merit of the salvage, so far as the inhabitants of the island are concerned, was in getting the news to the steamer promptly, and procuring her assistance. But only two of the salvors were actually engaged in. this service.

There is some reason to suppose that the ill feeling may have arisen out of an attempt on the part of Smith to monopolize the benefits of the discovery he had made. If he made the attempt, it was not successful. The others aided during Wednesday, and his services during that day entitle him to be considered one of the salvors. The objection that he is in the employment of the government cannot avail. The vessel saved was not the property of the government; and no law or order has been show requiring the keepers of light-houses to render gratuitous services beyond the line of their ordinary employment as such keepers. Such a Jaw does apply under some circumstances to the officers and crews of our revenue-cutters, whose duty includes, by statute, certain services of this nature.

I find that the property saved was the vessel and her tackle; that the whole must be considered a common fund and a common service, and that the libellants are not justified in severing them and proceeding against the vessel alone, without mention of the articles belonging to her which were saved on and near the shore, and by that suppression making a libel which is substantially untrue. [910]*910The money received for the tackle must be brought into the common, fund, and Smith must be admitted as one of the salvors. I repeat that there is no question before me concerning the amounts which the several salvors shall have.

Captain Church, whose oxen were used, is entitled to a fair compensation for their use; but they cannot be salvors, nor make him one. Vessels aré the only exception to the rule that the supply of tools or other things does not constitute their owner a salvor: The Charlotte, 3 W. Rob. Adm. 72; The Vine, 2 Hagg. Adm. 1. This exception stands on grounds of public policy; and the salvage compensation does not depend on any actual use of the vessel. It is a premium for permitting the service to be performed by the crew of the vessel, or by the vessel itself, as the case may be.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gonzales v. United States
42 Ct. Cl. 299 (Court of Claims, 1907)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
18 F. Cas. 908, 1 Low. 274, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/the-ottawa-mad-1868.