The Ohio Security Insurance Company v. Kinsale Insurance Company

CourtDistrict Court, S.D. New York
DecidedJanuary 10, 2024
Docket1:24-cv-00149
StatusUnknown

This text of The Ohio Security Insurance Company v. Kinsale Insurance Company (The Ohio Security Insurance Company v. Kinsale Insurance Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
The Ohio Security Insurance Company v. Kinsale Insurance Company, (S.D.N.Y. 2024).

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK THE OHIO SECURITY INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, 24-cv-00149 (PKC) -against- ORDER

KINSALE INSURANCE COMPANY and BLACK BULL BUILDERS, LLC, Defendants. nnn nnn nnn nnn nnn nen CASTEL, U.S.D.J. The limited subject matter jurisdiction of a district court is best addressed at the outset of a case. It falls upon the Court to raise issues of subject matter jurisdiction sua sponte. The Complaint invokes subject matter jurisdiction by reason of diversity of citizenship, 28 U.S.C. § 1332. (Complaint, ECF 1, § 13). “It is firmly established that diversity of citizenship should be distinctly and positively averred in the pleadings, or should appear with equal distinctness in other parts of the record.” Leveraged Leasing Administration Corp. v. PacifiCorp Capital, Inc., 87 F.3d 44, 47 (2d Cir. 1996) (internal quotations omitted). The Complaint alleges that defendant Black Bull Builders, LLC “is an entity incorporated under the laws of the State of New York, and maintains its principal office at 580 8th Avenue, New York, New York.” (Id. § 11). The name of this defendant indicates that it is a limited liability company. “A limited liability company [] takes the citizenship of each of its members.” Bayerische Landesbank, New York Branch v. Alladin Capital Management LLC, 692 F.3d 42, 49 (2d Cir. 2012).

In order for the Court to evaluate whether complete diversity exists between the plaintiff and the defendants, the complaint must allege the citizenship of each of the members of Black Bull Builders, LLC. If a member 1s an individual, the plaintiff must plead the individual’s state of domicile; if a member is a corporation, the plaintiff must plead the corporation’s state of incorporation and principal place of business, and if the member is a limited liability company, the plaintiff must then plead the citizenship of its members. Additionally, the plaintiff indicates that “[u]pon information and belief, Ohio Security is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of New Hampshire with its place of business located at 175 Berkley Street, Boston, Massachusetts.” The plaintiff should not allege its own citizenship “upon information and belief.” Further, the plaintiff must allege its principal place of business, not merely its “place of business.” Within seven days of this Order, the plaintiff may serve upon Black Bull Builders, LLC an interrogatory limited to the citizenship of its members. Within fourteen days of this Order, the plaintiff shall file an Amended Complaint that properly alleges the citizenship of all parties, or the action will be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. SO ORDERED. LZ Boeoon LZ Rows Lol United States District Judge Dated: New York, New York January 10, 2024

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
The Ohio Security Insurance Company v. Kinsale Insurance Company, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/the-ohio-security-insurance-company-v-kinsale-insurance-company-nysd-2024.