The Ohio Masonic Home v. National Labor Relations Board
This text of 511 F.2d 527 (The Ohio Masonic Home v. National Labor Relations Board) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
511 F.2d 527
89 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2704, 77 Lab.Cas. P 11,043
The OHIO MASONIC HOME, Petitioner,
v.
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent.
No. 74--1640.
United States Court of Appeals,
Sixth Circuit.
Feb. 25, 1975.
Hugh Barnett, Martin, Browne, Hull & Harper, Springfield, Ohio, for petitioner.
Elliott Moore, Sandra McCandless, Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Joseph E. Mayer, Peter G. Nash, John S. Irving, Jr., Patrick H. Hardin, Washington, D.C., for respondent.
Before PECK and MILLER, Circuit Judges, and HERMANSDORFER, District Judge.*
ORDER
This order is before the Court upon a petition of The Ohio Masonic Home to review an order of the National Labor Relations Board and upon the cross-petition of the Board to enforce the order. The decision and order of the Board are reported at 205 NLRB No. 65.
Being fully advised in the premises, the Court concludes that the findings of fact of the Board are supported by substantial evidence on the record considered as a whole, and therefore,
It is ordered that the order of the National Labor Relations Board be and it hereby is enforced.
Honorable Howard David Hermansdorfer, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky, sitting by designation
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
511 F.2d 527, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/the-ohio-masonic-home-v-national-labor-relations-board-ca6-1975.