The N. & W. No. 2

108 F. 989, 46 C.C.A. 686, 1901 U.S. App. LEXIS 3873
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit
DecidedMay 10, 1901
DocketNo. 147
StatusPublished

This text of 108 F. 989 (The N. & W. No. 2) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
The N. & W. No. 2, 108 F. 989, 46 C.C.A. 686, 1901 U.S. App. LEXIS 3873 (2d Cir. 1901).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The testimony is most conflicting, and the contradictions of fact so sharp that it is absolutely impossible to harmonize them upon any theory. Nearly all the witnesses called by the libelant were examined by deposition. Nearly all those called by the claimant were before the district judge. We have not been able out of this mass of contradictions to satisfy ourselves that his ultimate conclusions should he reversed, although we may not concur in all his findings. The weight of evidence seems to indicate that the tow was not steered with the care and jjrompt attention to incipient sheers which the situation called for, and that the tug laid her course closer to the northern edge of the channel than she should have done, in view of the existing conditions. Decree affirmed, without interest or costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
108 F. 989, 46 C.C.A. 686, 1901 U.S. App. LEXIS 3873, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/the-n-w-no-2-ca2-1901.