The Montauk

17 F. 96
CourtUnited States Circuit Court
DecidedApril 15, 1883
StatusPublished

This text of 17 F. 96 (The Montauk) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Circuit Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
The Montauk, 17 F. 96 (uscirct 1883).

Opinion

Welker, J.

The libelant was the wheelsman on the Montauk, and while in the Sault Ste. Marie river the schooner, on the fourth of August, 1881, in tow of a tug, ran aground, and the libelant, then at the wheel executing an order of the master, was injured by the wheel spinning around and striking him. The libelant claims that the master gave him an improper order, and that, while executing it, he was injured without his fault. This is denied, and it is alleged the libelant was injured through his own carelessness. The court finds that the order given the wheelsman, from the weight, of the evidence, was a proper one; that the libelant, in executing the order, was himself guilty of carelessness, which produced the injury, and therefore not entitled to recover. The libel is dismissed, with costs, and the appeal allowed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
17 F. 96, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/the-montauk-uscirct-1883.