The Minesen Co. v. McHugh

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in The Minesen Co. v. McHugh. Read the opinion of the Court — 671 F.3d 1332
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided April 11, 2011·No. 2010-1453·Unpublished

Opinion

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit THE MINESEN COMPANY, Appellan,t, V. JOHN MCHUGH, SECRETARY OF THE ARMY, Appellee. . 2010-1453 Appea1 from the Arrned Services Board of Contract Appeals in no. 56346, Adrninistrative Judge Michael T. Paul. ON MOTION Before RADER, Chief Ju,dge. 0 R D E R The Minesen Company moves for a 7-day extension of time to file its reply brief and for leave to exceed the permitted word limitation for its reply brief by filing a brief of up to 10,00G words The Secretary of the Army opposes the extra w0rds. Minesen replies. Upon consideration thereof

MINESEN C0 V. ARMY 2 IT IS ORDERED THATZ (1) The motion for an extension of time is m0ot. (2) The motion to exceed the permitted word limita- tion is denied The reply brief, not to exceed 7,000 words, is due within 14 days of the date of filing of this order FOR THE COURT l 1 2Il]I lsi Jan Horbaly Date J an HorbaIy Clerk cc: Thomas A. Lemmer, Esq J ames R. Sweet, Esq. s20 F{ !I.S. COURT OlI?'§\P’EALS FOR THE FEDERAL C|RCUIT APR_ 1 1 2011 .|AI| HORBALY ClEH£

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The Minesen Co. v. McHugh, (Fed. Cir. 2011).

The Minesen Co. v. McHugh (The Minesen Co. v. McHugh) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.