The McDonald

16 F. Cas. 37, 4 Blatchf. 477, 1860 U.S. App. LEXIS 590
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York·Decided November 30, 1860·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

NELSON, Circuit Justice.

It was erroneous in the court below to allow costs on the dismissal of the libel for want of jurisdiction. In such a case, by the settled practice of the supreme court, no costs are allowed. So much of the decree below as awarded costs to the claimant must, therefore, be reversed. As the libellant had a right to come to this court to reverse that part of the decree, below which awarded costs against him, I shall not allow costs against him on the appeal, although a part of the decree appealed from is affirmed; and, because he cláimed to reverse the whole decree, I shall not allow any costs to him on the appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The McDonald, 16 F. Cas. 37, 4 Blatchf. 477, 1860 U.S. App. LEXIS 590 (circtsdny 1860).

16 F. Cas. 37 (The McDonald) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pentlarge v. Kirby
20 F. 898 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York, 1884)
Cooper v. New Haven Steam-Boat Co.
18 F. 588 (S.D. New York, 1883)
Wenberg v. A Cargo of Mineral Phosphate
15 F. 285 (S.D. New York, 1883)