The Matter of the Claim of Lidia Burgos v. Citywide Central Insurance Program
This text of The Matter of the Claim of Lidia Burgos v. Citywide Central Insurance Program (The Matter of the Claim of Lidia Burgos v. Citywide Central Insurance Program) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This memorandum is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the New York Reports. -----------------------------------------------------------------
No. 142 SSM 33 In the Matter of the Claim of Lidia Burgos, Appellant, v. Citywide Central Insurance Program et al., Respondents, Workers' Compensation Board, Respondent.
Submitted by Michael D. Uysal, for appellant. Submitted by J. Evan Perigoe, for respondents Citywide Central Insurance Program et al. Submitted by Laura Etlinger, for respondent Workers' Compensation Board.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules, order affirmed, with costs. The Appellate Division properly concluded that substantial evidence supports the Workers' Compensation Board's determinations as to the claimant's degree of impairment and loss of wage-earning capacity (see generally Matter of Zamora v New York Neurologic Assoc., 19 NY3d 186, 192-193 [2012]). Chief Judge DiFiore and Judges Rivera, Stein, Fahey, Garcia, Wilson and Feinman concur.
Decided November 16, 2017
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
The Matter of the Claim of Lidia Burgos v. Citywide Central Insurance Program, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/the-matter-of-the-claim-of-lidia-burgos-v-citywide-central-insurance-ny-2017.