The Matter of Roland Green v. Darwin LaClair
This text of The Matter of Roland Green v. Darwin LaClair (The Matter of Roland Green v. Darwin LaClair) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
State of New York Court of Appeals This memorandum is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the New York Reports.
No. 94 SSM 23 In the Matter of Roland Green, Respondent, v. Darwin LaClair, &c., Appellant.
Submitted by Brian D. Ginsberg, for appellant. Submitted by Michael E. Cassidy, for respondent.
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules, order affirmed, without costs (see People ex rel. Negron v Superintendent, Woodbourne Corr. Facility, __ NY3d __ [decided today]). Judges Rivera, Stein, Garcia, Wilson and Feinman concur. Chief Judge DiFiore and Judge Fahey dissent for reasons stated in the dissenting opinion in People ex rel. Negron v Superintendent, Woodbourne Corr. Facility (__ NY3d __ [Fahey, J. dissenting] [decided today]).
Decided November 23, 2020
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
The Matter of Roland Green v. Darwin LaClair, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/the-matter-of-roland-green-v-darwin-laclair-ny-2020.