The Matter of People Care Incorporated v. City of New York Human Resources Administration

CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedMarch 25, 2021
Docket13
StatusPublished

This text of The Matter of People Care Incorporated v. City of New York Human Resources Administration (The Matter of People Care Incorporated v. City of New York Human Resources Administration) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
The Matter of People Care Incorporated v. City of New York Human Resources Administration, (N.Y. 2021).

Opinion

State of New York MEMORANDUM Court of Appeals This memorandum is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the New York Reports.

No. 13 In the Matter of People Care Incorporated, &c., Respondent, v. City of New York Human Resources Administration, et al., Appellants.

Eric Lee, for appellants. Thomas J. Fleming, for respondent. New York State Department of Health, amicus curiae.

MEMORANDUM:

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, with costs, and the matter

remitted to the Appellate Division for consideration of issues raised but not determined on

the appeal to that Court.

-1- -2- No. 13

For the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion below (Matter of People Care Inc.

v City of New York, 175 AD3d 134, 147-152 [1st Dept 2020] [Richter, J.P., dissenting]),

we conclude that the funds for personal care services paid to petitioner People Care, Inc.

under the Health Care Reform Act (Public Health Law §§ 2807-v [1] [bb] [i], [iii]) are

Medicaid funds subject to the audit and recoupment authority of the City of New York

Human Resources Administration (HRA) in accordance with the parties’ 2001 contract. In

light of our holding, we do not address HRA’s contentions regarding whether petitioner

must follow the contractual dispute resolution procedures or the merits of HRA’s

recoupment demand, issues that were not decided by the Appellate Division.

Order reversed, with costs, and matter remitted to the Appellate Division, First Department, for consideration of issues raised but not determined on the appeal to that Court, in a memorandum. Chief Judge DiFiore and Judges Rivera, Stein, Fahey, Garcia and Wilson concur.

Decided March 25, 2021

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 2807
New York PBH § 2807

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
The Matter of People Care Incorporated v. City of New York Human Resources Administration, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/the-matter-of-people-care-incorporated-v-city-of-new-york-human-resources-ny-2021.