The Matter of Jamael Bursch v. Purchase College of the State University of New York
This text of The Matter of Jamael Bursch v. Purchase College of the State University of New York (The Matter of Jamael Bursch v. Purchase College of the State University of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
State of New York MEMORANDUM Court of Appeals This memorandum is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the New York Reports.
No. 63 SSM 8 In the Matter of Jamael Bursch, Appellant, v. Purchase College of the State University of New York, et al., Respondents.
Submitted by Peter E. Brill, for appellant. Submitted by Seth M. Rokosky, for respondents.
MEMORANDUM:
The order of the Appellate Division insofar as appealed from should be reversed,
with costs, and the petition insofar as it sought to annul respondents’ disciplinary
determination granted and the matter remitted to the Appellate Division with directions to
-1- -2- SSM No. 8
remand to respondents for a new disciplinary hearing. Petitioner, a student enrolled at
respondent Purchase College of the State University of New York, was accused of multiple
disciplinary violations including sexual assault of another student. Petitioner requested a
three-hour adjournment of his scheduled administrative hearing so that his attorney could
attend the proceeding. Respondents denied this request. Under the particular
circumstances of this case, we find respondents abused their discretion as a matter of law
by failing to grant the requested adjournment (see Matter of Abdur-Raheem v Mann, 85
NY2d 113, 124 [1995]). Petitioner’s remaining arguments need not be reached and any
other contentions raised below have been abandoned.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules, order insofar as appealed from reversed, with costs, and petition insofar as it sought to annul respondents’ disciplinary determination granted and matter remitted to the Appellate Division, Second Department, with directions to remand to respondents for a new disciplinary hearing, in a memorandum. Judges Rivera, Stein, Fahey, Garcia, Wilson and Feinman concur. Chief Judge DiFiore took no part.
Decided June 6, 2019
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
The Matter of Jamael Bursch v. Purchase College of the State University of New York, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/the-matter-of-jamael-bursch-v-purchase-college-of-the-state-university-of-ny-2019.