The Matter of County of Broome v. Nirav R. Shah
This text of The Matter of County of Broome v. Nirav R. Shah (The Matter of County of Broome v. Nirav R. Shah) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This memorandum is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the New York Reports. -----------------------------------------------------------------
No. 69 SSM 43 In the Matter of County of Broome, Respondent, v. Nirav R. Shah, &c., et al., Appellants.
Submitted by Victor Paladino, for appellants. Respondent, precluded.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules, order reversed, without costs, petition dismissed in its entirety, and a declaration made in favor of respondents Nirav R. Shah, &c., et al. that section 61 of part D of Chapter 56 of the Laws of 2012 has not been shown to be unconstitutional (see Matter of County of Chemung v Shah, 28 NY3d 244 [2016]). Chief Judge DiFiore and Judges Rivera, Abdus-Salaam, Garcia and Wilson concur. Judges Stein and Fahey took no part.
Decided February 16, 2017
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
The Matter of County of Broome v. Nirav R. Shah, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/the-matter-of-county-of-broome-v-nirav-r-shah-ny-2017.