The Margaret Irving

Second Circuit

The Margaret Irving

47 F.2d 230, 1931 U.S. App. LEXIS 3449

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedJanuary 5, 1931

DocketNo. 155

StatusPublished

Cited by7 cases

This text of 47 F.2d 230 (The Margaret Irving) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

The Margaret Irving, 47 F.2d 230, 1931 U.S. App. LEXIS 3449 (2d Cir. 1931).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Though this is an appeal in the admiralty, the claimant has filed no assignments of error, and, under Rule 37 (3) of this court, cannot be heard to complain of so much of the decree as found the tug at fault. -

We cannot agree that the barge was chargeable with fault for the make-up of the tow. It has been the universal rule, so far as we know, that, as to this, the tug is master, •and the tow must follow her directions. The [231]*231Quickstep, 9 Wall. 665, 19 L. Ed. 767; Eastern Transportation Line v. Hope, 95 U. S. 297, 24 L. Ed. 477; The Manhattan, 186 F. 329 (C. C. A. 2). See, also, Cranberry Creek Co. v. Red Star Co., 33 F.(2d) 272 (C. C. A. 2). Plainly this must be so, unless a flotilla is to have a divided command, a thing not tolerable upon the water.

Decree reversed, and cause remanded, with instructions to enter a decree for full damages.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Though this is an appeal in the admiralty, the claimant has filed no assignments of error, and, under Rule 37 (3) of this court, cannot be heard to complain of so much of the decree as found the tug at fault. -

We cannot agree that the barge was chargeable with fault for the make-up of the tow. It has been the universal rule, so far as we know, that, as to this, the tug is master, •and the tow must follow her directions. The [231]*231Quickstep, 9 Wall. 665, 19 L. Ed. 767; Eastern Transportation Line v. Hope, 95 U. S. 297, 24 L. Ed. 477; The Manhattan, 186 F. 329 (C. C. A. 2). See, also, Cranberry Creek Co. v. Red Star Co., 33 F.(2d) 272 (C. C. A. 2). Plainly this must be so, unless a flotilla is to have a divided command, a thing not tolerable upon the water.

Decree reversed, and cause remanded, with instructions to enter a decree for full damages.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

47 F.2d 230, 1931 U.S. App. LEXIS 3449, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/the-margaret-irving-ca2-1931.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack