The Margaret Irving

47 F.2d 230, 1931 U.S. App. LEXIS 3449
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided January 5, 1931·No. No. 155·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Though this is an appeal in the admiralty, the claimant has filed no assignments of error, and, under Rule 37 (3) of this court, cannot be heard to complain of so much of the decree as found the tug at fault. -

We cannot agree that the barge was chargeable with fault for the make-up of the tow. It has been the universal rule, so far as we know, that, as to this, the tug is master, •and the tow must follow her directions. The [231] Quickstep, 9 Wall. 665, 19 L. Ed. 767; Eastern Transportation Line v. Hope, 95 U. S. 297, 24 L. Ed. 477; The Manhattan, 186 F. 329 (C. C. A. 2). See, also, Cranberry Creek Co. v. Red Star Co., 33 F.(2d) 272 (C. C. A. 2). Plainly this must be so, unless a flotilla is to have a divided command, a thing not tolerable upon the water.

Decree reversed, and cause remanded, with instructions to enter a decree for full damages.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The Margaret Irving, 47 F.2d 230, 1931 U.S. App. LEXIS 3449 (2d Cir. 1931).

47 F.2d 230 (The Margaret Irving) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. the Tug Terry E. Buchanan
138 F. Supp. 754 (S.D. New York, 1956)
The Raleigh
50 F. Supp. 961 (D. Maryland, 1943)
Bouchard Transp. Co. v. Conners Marine Co.
129 F.2d 110 (Second Circuit, 1942)
The Susanna E. Waldie
37 F. Supp. 84 (E.D. New York, 1941)
The Julia C. Davin
70 F.2d 268 (Second Circuit, 1934)
The Elizabeth M. Miller
3 F. Supp. 171 (W.D. New York, 1932)
Madeira Hill & Co. v. Neville
46 F.2d 534 (E.D. New York, 1931)