The Manitou
127 F. 554, 63 C.C.A. 109, 1903 U.S. App. LEXIS 4414
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided December 11, 1903·No. No. 41·Published·Cited by 8 cases
Opinion
We do not think it. necessary to add anything to the opinion of the District Judge, concurring with him in the conclu,[555] sion that the claimant has not satisfactorily shown that the valves through which the steam made its way were closed when the steamer sailed. The damages have been calculated in accordance with the rule laid down by this court in The Styria, toi Fed. 728, 41 C. C. A. 639. We see no reason to modify the views-therein expressed.
The decree is affirmed, with interest and costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
The Manitou, 127 F. 554, 63 C.C.A. 109, 1903 U.S. App. LEXIS 4414 (2d Cir. 1903).
127 F. 554 (The Manitou) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
The Jl Luckenbach
65 F.2d 570 (Second Circuit, 1933)
California Victor Distributing Co. v. Coonan
65 F.2d 570 (Second Circuit, 1933)
California Victor Distributing Co. v. Luckenbach S. S. Co.
1 F. Supp. 692 (S.D. New York, 1932)
The Steel Navigator
23 F.2d 590 (Second Circuit, 1928)
The Newport
7 F.2d 452 (Ninth Circuit, 1925)
G. Amsinck & Co. v. Pacific Mail S. S. Co.
7 F.2d 452 (Ninth Circuit, 1925)
Bradley v. Lehigh Valley R.
153 F. 350 (Second Circuit, 1907)
The Oneida
128 F. 687 (Second Circuit, 1904)