The Manitou

127 F. 554, 63 C.C.A. 109, 1903 U.S. App. LEXIS 4414
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit
DecidedDecember 11, 1903
DocketNo. 41
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 127 F. 554 (The Manitou) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
The Manitou, 127 F. 554, 63 C.C.A. 109, 1903 U.S. App. LEXIS 4414 (2d Cir. 1903).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We do not think it. necessary to add anything to the opinion of the District Judge, concurring with him in the conclu,[555]*555sion that the claimant has not satisfactorily shown that the valves through which the steam made its way were closed when the steamer sailed. The damages have been calculated in accordance with the rule laid down by this court in The Styria, toi Fed. 728, 41 C. C. A. 639. We see no reason to modify the views-therein expressed.

The decree is affirmed, with interest and costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

The Jl Luckenbach
65 F.2d 570 (Second Circuit, 1933)
California Victor Distributing Co. v. Coonan
65 F.2d 570 (Second Circuit, 1933)
The Steel Navigator
23 F.2d 590 (Second Circuit, 1928)
The Newport
7 F.2d 452 (Ninth Circuit, 1925)
G. Amsinck & Co. v. Pacific Mail S. S. Co.
7 F.2d 452 (Ninth Circuit, 1925)
Bradley v. Lehigh Valley R.
153 F. 350 (Second Circuit, 1907)
The Oneida
128 F. 687 (Second Circuit, 1904)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
127 F. 554, 63 C.C.A. 109, 1903 U.S. App. LEXIS 4414, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/the-manitou-ca2-1903.