The M. E. Luckenbach
214 F. 571, 131 C.C.A. 177, 1914 U.S. App. LEXIS 1161
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided April 28, 1914·No. No. 250·Published·Cited by 15 cases
Opinion
We have no doubt that the place of stranding is-where the government witnesses locate it. That being so, it seems very plain that the stranding was due to the b.arge’s failure to anchor in time and with sufficient chain. Judge Veeder has very fully and carefully discussed the testimony. We concur with his reasoning and conclusion.
The decree is affirmed, with costs, on his opinion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
The M. E. Luckenbach, 214 F. 571, 131 C.C.A. 177, 1914 U.S. App. LEXIS 1161 (2d Cir. 1914).
214 F. 571 (The M. E. Luckenbach) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Exner Sand & Gravel Corp. v. Petterson Lighterage & Towing Corp.
150 F. Supp. 585 (E.D. New York, 1957)
Porello v. United States
153 F.2d 605 (Second Circuit, 1946)
Eriksen v. Pacific American Fisheries
81 F.2d 680 (Ninth Circuit, 1936)
In Re Pennsylvania R. Co.
48 F.2d 559 (Second Circuit, 1931)
Wathen v. WestmoreLand Coal Co.
40 F.2d 47 (Fourth Circuit, 1930)
American Sugar Refining Co. v. City of New York
33 F.2d 97 (Second Circuit, 1929)
Cleary Bros. v. Port Reading R. Co.
29 F.2d 495 (Second Circuit, 1928)
The Townsend
29 F.2d 491 (Second Circuit, 1928)
The Panther
5 F.2d 64 (Second Circuit, 1925)
Acktieselskabet Bolgen v. McWilliams Bros.
3 F.2d 541 (Second Circuit, 1924)
The Silvia
2 F.2d 105 (E.D. New York, 1924)
The Robert R.
255 F. 37 (Second Circuit, 1918)
The Westchester
254 F. 576 (Second Circuit, 1918)
The Sunnyside
251 F. 271 (Second Circuit, 1918)