The M. E. Luckenbach
This text of 214 F. 571 (The M. E. Luckenbach) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We have no doubt that the place of stranding is-where the government witnesses locate it. That being so, it seems very plain that the stranding was due to the b.arge’s failure to anchor in time and with sufficient chain. Judge Veeder has very fully and carefully discussed the testimony. We concur with his reasoning and conclusion.
The decree is affirmed, with costs, on his opinion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
214 F. 571, 131 C.C.A. 177, 1914 U.S. App. LEXIS 1161, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/the-m-e-luckenbach-ca2-1914.