The Louise Rugge

265 F. 1019, 1920 U.S. App. LEXIS 1518
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit
DecidedJuly 6, 1920
DocketNo. 2557
StatusPublished

This text of 265 F. 1019 (The Louise Rugge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
The Louise Rugge, 265 F. 1019, 1920 U.S. App. LEXIS 1518 (3d Cir. 1920).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This collision case involved no legal principles, but turned wholly on a question of fact. On that question of fact the experienced Judge below cited, discussed and passed upon the evidence in an extensive opinon •which adequately covered every phase of the case. As we have said, no principle is involved; the case is simply one of its own facts; it forms no precedent. An opinion by this Court would simply be an attempt to state and record in different words what has been thoroughly done by the Court below. We therefore restrict ourselves to saying we have examined the proofs and we agree with the Court below. Accordingly, we affirm its decree.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
265 F. 1019, 1920 U.S. App. LEXIS 1518, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/the-louise-rugge-ca3-1920.