The Langdon Cheves: Lamb

Supreme Court

The Langdon Cheves: Lamb

17 U.S. 103, 4 L. Ed. 525, 4 Wheat. 103, 1819 U.S. LEXIS 307

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedFebruary 16, 1819

StatusPublished

Cited by7 cases

This text of 17 U.S. 103 (The Langdon Cheves: Lamb) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

The Langdon Cheves: Lamb, 17 U.S. 103, 4 L. Ed. 525, 4 Wheat. 103, 1819 U.S. LEXIS 307 (1819).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Justice Story

delivered the opinion of the Court. This case differs in no essential respect, from, that of the Caledonian. The'brig sailed from the United States on a voyage to Lisbon, with a cargo of provisions, in May, 1813, and was captured by a British sloop of war, and sent into Bermuda, where she was either not proceeded against as prize, or was acquitted on trial; and after a detention of about six weeks, was permitted to resume her original voyage; and on the return, voyage from Lisbon, with a cargo of salt, was, on her arrival at Newport, on the 16th of December, 1813, seized by the collector of that port, as forfeited tp the United States jure belli, for using a British license, and trading with the enemy.

There is no positive proof, that the brig had a British license on board; but, we think, that under the. circumstances, there arises a violent presumption that she had such a license, and'that the burthen of proof to repel this presumption rests on the claimant. He has not attempted this in the slightest degree, there being a total absence of all evidence in his favour; and, therefore, as the case remains with all its original imperfections, the decree of the Circuit Court is affirmed, with costs.

Decree affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Justice Story

delivered the opinion of the Court. This case differs in no essential respect, from, that of the Caledonian. The'brig sailed from the United States on a voyage to Lisbon, with a cargo of provisions, in May, 1813, and was captured by a British sloop of war, and sent into Bermuda, where she was either not proceeded against as prize, or was acquitted on trial; and after a detention of about six weeks, was permitted to resume her original voyage; and on the return, voyage from Lisbon, with a cargo of salt, was, on her arrival at Newport, on the 16th of December, 1813, seized by the collector of that port, as forfeited tp the United States jure belli, for using a British license, and trading with the enemy.

There is no positive proof, that the brig had a British license on board; but, we think, that under the. circumstances, there arises a violent presumption that she had such a license, and'that the burthen of proof to repel this presumption rests on the claimant. He has not attempted this in the slightest degree, there being a total absence of all evidence in his favour; and, therefore, as the case remains with all its original imperfections, the decree of the Circuit Court is affirmed, with costs.

Decree affirmed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

17 U.S. 103, 4 L. Ed. 525, 4 Wheat. 103, 1819 U.S. LEXIS 307, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/the-langdon-cheves-lamb-scotus-1819.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack