The Kirke La Shelle Company v. . Armstrong
120 N.E. 866, 224 N.Y. 582, 1918 N.Y. LEXIS 969
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Chase, Collin, Cuddeback, Hogan, Cardozo and McLaughlin, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
The Kirke La Shelle Company v. . Armstrong, 120 N.E. 866, 224 N.Y. 582, 1918 N.Y. LEXIS 969 (N.Y. 1918).
120 N.E. 866 (The Kirke La Shelle Company v. . Armstrong) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re the Estate of Mills
171 Misc. 42 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1939)
Kirke La Shelle Co. v. Paul Armstrong Co.
188 N.E. 163 (New York Court of Appeals, 1933)
Kirke La Shelle Co. v. Paul Armstrong Co.
143 Misc. 707 (New York Supreme Court, 1932)