The King v. Philip Henry Rapp

1 U.S. 9, 1 Dall. 9
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedApril 1, 1764
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 1 U.S. 9 (The King v. Philip Henry Rapp) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
The King v. Philip Henry Rapp, 1 U.S. 9, 1 Dall. 9 (1764).

Opinion

Indictment for misdemeanor, in marrying a man to a woman who had another husband living. Moved, on the part of the defendant, to put off the trial, on affidavit of material witnesses wanting, and that he had taken the proper steps to get them. Opposed by the attorney-general, as being a criminal case, and not within the rules .of civil eases. But granted By the Court, the defendant being a clergyman, and his living depending on his acquittal: but declared not to be a precedent. (b)

(b)

In Rex v. D’Eon, 3 Burr. 1513, the court said, that in all cases, whether criminal or civil, a trial shall not be hurried on, so as to do injustice to the defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

The LESSEE OF ALBERTSON v. Robeson
1 U.S. 9 (Supreme Court, 1764)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 U.S. 9, 1 Dall. 9, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/the-king-v-philip-henry-rapp-scotus-1764.