The King v. Grant

1 Super. Ct. Jud. 326
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedOctober 15, 1771
StatusPublished

This text of 1 Super. Ct. Jud. 326 (The King v. Grant) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
The King v. Grant, 1 Super. Ct. Jud. 326 (Mass. 1771).

Opinion

GRANT was a Prisoner in Concord Goal and, on Motion of the Attorney General, was removed to Cambridge Goal by parol Order, which I have taken Notice is the constant Practice of the Court.

And note that a Habeas Corpus ad Testificandum was awarded for Abram Littlehead at the Motion of the Attorney General.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Super. Ct. Jud. 326, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/the-king-v-grant-mass-1771.