The King v. Anderson
This text of 1 Haw. 41 (The King v. Anderson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
charged the jury, that every fraudulent combination, mutual understanding, or concerting together of two or m ire, to do what is obviously and directly wrongfully injurious to another, is a conspiracy; and that if they believed that Anderson and Russell understood each other and concerted together to defraud Watson and others, they were guilty. That it was not necessary to prove a direct concert between Anderson and Russell, but that such concert was a fair Subject of inference for the jury, from all the facts submitted in evidence. That a mutual concert in cases like this, could seldom if ever be proved, otherwise than by circumstances, as conspirators do not call in witnesses to their undertakings.
The jury rendered a verdict of guilty, and the court sentenced each of the prisoners to imprisonment at hard labor for the term of eighteen months.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 Haw. 41, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/the-king-v-anderson-haw-1851.