The Kate Cann

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern New York

The Kate Cann

8 F. 719, 1881 U.S. App. LEXIS 2406

CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern New York

DecidedJune 28, 1881

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 8 F. 719 (The Kate Cann) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

The Kate Cann, 8 F. 719, 1881 U.S. App. LEXIS 2406 (circtedny 1881).

Pincite

Opinion

BiíAtchfqRD, G. J.

I am entirely satisfied with the conclusions arrived at by the district judge in this case, and with the reason assigned by him therefor in his decision. The case is one where the damage sued for was caused by the wrongful neglect, upon navigable water, of a maritime duty owing to the libellant by the owners of the vessel, and arising out of the employment of the vessel as a carrier of cargo, and for which the vessel herself is liable. The facts and the law are carefully examined by the district judge, and the distinc[720]*720tion between the present case and The Germania, 9 Ben. 356, is satisfactorily shown. ■_ . .

There "must be a decree for the libellant for $3,000, with interest from November 8, 188Ó, and his costs taxed in the district court at $325.30, and his costs in this court to be taxed.

See 2 Fed. Rep. 241.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BiíAtchfqRD, G. J.

I am entirely satisfied with the conclusions arrived at by the district judge in this case, and with the reason assigned by him therefor in his decision. The case is one where the damage sued for was caused by the wrongful neglect, upon navigable water, of a maritime duty owing to the libellant by the owners of the vessel, and arising out of the employment of the vessel as a carrier of cargo, and for which the vessel herself is liable. The facts and the law are carefully examined by the district judge, and the distinc[720]*720tion between the present case and The Germania, 9 Ben. 356, is satisfactorily shown. ■_ . .

There "must be a decree for the libellant for $3,000, with interest from November 8, 188Ó, and his costs taxed in the district court at $325.30, and his costs in this court to be taxed.

See 2 Fed. Rep. 241.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

8 F. 719, 1881 U.S. App. LEXIS 2406, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/the-kate-cann-circtedny-1881.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack