The James Tufft

125 F. 1003, 60 C.C.A. 688, 1903 U.S. App. LEXIS 4258
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedOctober 14, 1903
DocketNo. 992
StatusPublished

This text of 125 F. 1003 (The James Tufft) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
The James Tufft, 125 F. 1003, 60 C.C.A. 688, 1903 U.S. App. LEXIS 4258 (9th Cir. 1903).

Opinion

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the District of Hawaii. T. C. Van Ness and L. A. Redman, for appellants. Upon filing of stipulation of counsel therefor, and upon motion of counsel, the appeal is dismissed; T. McCants Stewart signing stipulation as counsel for the appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
125 F. 1003, 60 C.C.A. 688, 1903 U.S. App. LEXIS 4258, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/the-james-tufft-ca9-1903.