the J. Gonzalez Law Firm, P. L. L. C. v. Law Offices of Raul Medina, P. C.

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedApril 6, 2006
Docket13-05-00732-CV
StatusPublished

This text of the J. Gonzalez Law Firm, P. L. L. C. v. Law Offices of Raul Medina, P. C. (the J. Gonzalez Law Firm, P. L. L. C. v. Law Offices of Raul Medina, P. C.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
the J. Gonzalez Law Firm, P. L. L. C. v. Law Offices of Raul Medina, P. C., (Tex. Ct. App. 2006).

Opinion

                             NUMBER 13-05-732-CV

                         COURT OF APPEALS

               THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                  CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

________________________________________________________

THE J. GONZALEZ LAW FIRM, P.L.L.C.,                      Appellant,

                                           v.

LAW OFFICES OF RAUL MEDINA, P.C.,                        Appellee.

              On appeal from County Court at Law No. One

                           of Hidalgo County, Texas.

                     MEMORANDUM OPINION

                 Before Justices Hinojosa, Yañez, and Garza

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam


Appellant, THE J. GONZALEZ LAW FIRM, P.L.L.C., perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by County Court at Law No. One of Hidalgo County, Texas, in cause number CL-05-1412-A.  After the notice of appeal was filed, appellant filed an unopposed  motion to dismiss the appeal.  In the motion, appellant states that the judgment from which this appeal was taken was set aside by order of the trial court granting appellant=s motion for new trial.  Appellant requests that this Court dismiss the appeal and that costs be taxed to the party incurring same.

The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant=s motion to dismiss the appeal, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted.  Appellant=s motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION.

PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed this

the 6th day of April, 2006.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
the J. Gonzalez Law Firm, P. L. L. C. v. Law Offices of Raul Medina, P. C., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/the-j-gonzalez-law-firm-p-l-l-c-v-law-offices-of-r-texapp-2006.