The Irvine Co. v. Coyne CA4/3

California Court of Appeal

The Irvine Co. v. Coyne CA4/3

DecidedMay 20, 2014

DocketG048584

StatusUnpublished

This text of The Irvine Co. v. Coyne CA4/3 (The Irvine Co. v. Coyne CA4/3) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

The Irvine Co. v. Coyne CA4/3, (Cal. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

Filed 5/20/14 The Irvine Co. v. Coyne CA4/3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

THE IRVINE COMPANY,

Plaintiff and Appellant, G048584

v. (Super. Ct. No. 30-2011-00532320)

JEFFREY B. COYNE, OPINION

Defendant and Respondent.

Appeal from a postjudgment order of the Superior Court of Orange County, James Di Cesare, Judge. Affirmed. Bewley, Lassleben & Miller, and Ernie Zachary Park for Plaintiff and Appellant. Outwater & Pinckes, and Randi E. Pinckes for Defendant and Respondent.

* * * In a companion appeal, case No. G048234, we affirmed the March 18, 2013 judgment entered after the trial court granted summary judgment in Jeffrey Coyne’s favor in The Irvine Company, LLC’s (Irvine) action against Coyne for breach of guaranty and breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing. Subsequent to the March 18, 2013 judgment, on March 25, 2013, Coyne filed a memorandum of costs and a motion for attorney fees under Civil Code section 1717. On May 17, 2013, the court, finding that Coyne was the prevailing party entitled to attorney fees under a contract between the parties, ordered Irvine to pay Coyne $67,100 in attorney fees and costs. In the current appeal, Irvine requests this court to reverse the order requiring it to reimburse Coyne for his attorney fees and costs, if this court (in the companion appeal) reversed the underlying judgment. Because we affirmed the underlying judgment in the companion appeal, we affirm the court’s order concerning attorney fees and costs.

DISPOSITION

The postjudgment order is affirmed. Coyne shall recover his costs on appeal.

IKOLA, J.

WE CONCUR:

BEDSWORTH, ACTING P. J.

ARONSON, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Filed 5/20/14 The Irvine Co. v. Coyne CA4/3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

THE IRVINE COMPANY,

Plaintiff and Appellant, G048584

v. (Super. Ct. No. 30-2011-00532320)

JEFFREY B. COYNE, OPINION

Defendant and Respondent.

Appeal from a postjudgment order of the Superior Court of Orange County, James Di Cesare, Judge. Affirmed. Bewley, Lassleben & Miller, and Ernie Zachary Park for Plaintiff and Appellant. Outwater & Pinckes, and Randi E. Pinckes for Defendant and Respondent.

* * * In a companion appeal, case No. G048234, we affirmed the March 18, 2013 judgment entered after the trial court granted summary judgment in Jeffrey Coyne’s favor in The Irvine Company, LLC’s (Irvine) action against Coyne for breach of guaranty and breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing. Subsequent to the March 18, 2013 judgment, on March 25, 2013, Coyne filed a memorandum of costs and a motion for attorney fees under Civil Code section 1717. On May 17, 2013, the court, finding that Coyne was the prevailing party entitled to attorney fees under a contract between the parties, ordered Irvine to pay Coyne $67,100 in attorney fees and costs. In the current appeal, Irvine requests this court to reverse the order requiring it to reimburse Coyne for his attorney fees and costs, if this court (in the companion appeal) reversed the underlying judgment. Because we affirmed the underlying judgment in the companion appeal, we affirm the court’s order concerning attorney fees and costs.

DISPOSITION

The postjudgment order is affirmed. Coyne shall recover his costs on appeal.

IKOLA, J.

WE CONCUR:

BEDSWORTH, ACTING P. J.

ARONSON, J.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

The Irvine Co. v. Coyne CA4/3, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/the-irvine-co-v-coyne-ca43-calctapp-2014.