The Homesteaders v. Briggs

166 S.W. 95, 1914 Tex. App. LEXIS 648
CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedApril 11, 1914
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 166 S.W. 95 (The Homesteaders v. Briggs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
The Homesteaders v. Briggs, 166 S.W. 95, 1914 Tex. App. LEXIS 648 (Tex. Ct. App. 1914).

Opinion

RAINEY, C. J.

Simeon Singleton Briggs sued The Homesteaders to recover on a certificate insuring the life of appellee’s wife, Angie O. Briggs, for his benefit. The order defended on the ground that various misstatements were made in the application for the certificate by Mrs. Briggs, as to her physical condition, etc. The trial resulted in a verdict and judgment in favor of appel-lee, from which this appeal is taken.

The defendant requested a charge to the effect that under the evidence the plaintiff was not entitled to recover and the jury should find for defendant.

In the written application for insurance made by Mrs. Briggs, she made statements in answer to certain interrogatories as follows :

“1. A. Are you in strong, robust health and free from disease? Yes. B. How long have you been so? Most life. * * *
“3. * * * B. Has any physician ever giyen an unfavorable opinion of your physical condition with reference to life insurance or otherwise? No. (Who and when?) No. * * *
"5. Have you now or have you ever had any of the following diseases or symptoms? (The examining physician will require the person being examined to answer the following separately and explain the meaning of the terms used so that the answers may be true and correct.) A. * * * bronchitis, * * * chronic cough, consumption, la grippe, • * * * pneumonia, spitting blood, or any other disease of the throat or lungs? No. * * * e. * * * Shortness of breath? * * * No. * * * G. * * * malaria, * * * or any disease not mentioned? No. I
“6. Have you consulted or been under the care of a physician any time within the past ten years? Yes. (Explain fully, giving cause of illness, dates and names and addresses of all physicians consulted.) Dr. Herring, Mexia, Texas. If any of the above have been answered ‘yes’ please explain fully in the following form:
“13. Is there any fact relating to your physical condition, personal or family history or habits which has not been stated in the answers to the foregoing questions and with which the society ought to be made acquainted? No.
“14. Have you reviewed each and all of the above questions and answers to the same, and are you sure they are correct? Yes.”

The application signed by Mrs. Briggs also stipulates: “I declare and warrant that ,* * * the above statements, together with the statements and answers made, or to be made, by me in other parts of this application are literally true. I further agree that any untrue statement or answer, or any concealment of facts, intentional or otherwise, in this application (including the succeeding parts hereof) * * * shall forfeit the rights of myself and my beneficiary, or beneficiaries, to any and all benefits to be derived from my membership in said society.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Fraternal Aid Union v. Miller
1925 OK 173 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1925)
Sligh v. Sovereign Camp W. O. W.
109 S.E. 279 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1921)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
166 S.W. 95, 1914 Tex. App. LEXIS 648, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/the-homesteaders-v-briggs-texapp-1914.