The Hocking Valley Railway Company v. . Barbour
130 N.E. 909, 230 N.Y. 599, 1921 N.Y. LEXIS 878
This text of 130 N.E. 909 (The Hocking Valley Railway Company v. . Barbour) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
The Hocking Valley Railway Company v. . Barbour, 130 N.E. 909, 230 N.Y. 599, 1921 N.Y. LEXIS 878 (N.Y. 1921).
Opinion
Order affirmed, with- costs, and question certified answered in the affirmative; no opinion.
Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Hogan, Cardozo, Pound, McLaughlin, Crane and Andrews, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Feinbloom v. Friedman
211 A.D. 72 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1924)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
130 N.E. 909, 230 N.Y. 599, 1921 N.Y. LEXIS 878, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/the-hocking-valley-railway-company-v-barbour-ny-1921.