The Hibernia

12 F. Cas. 112, 1 Sprague 78
CourtDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts
DecidedApril 15, 1844
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 12 F. Cas. 112 (The Hibernia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Massachusetts primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
The Hibernia, 12 F. Cas. 112, 1 Sprague 78 (D. Mass. 1844).

Opinion

SPRAGUE, District Judge.

In the execution of admiralty process in rem, the officer should take actual and manifest possession, and hold it in such manner, that inquirers and observers may learn, or see, that he ha» such possession.

It is not necessary to decide, in this case, whether after such an arrest and possession, the officer must have some person on board, ■or near the vessel, during the whole time for which he charges fees. It is sufficient to say, that no proper arrest and possession have -been shown. The officer may so act, as to become responsible to both parties, for the safe-keeping of the vessel, and yet not entitle himself to fees. Where personal notice Is not ordered, it is on the supposition that the arrest and custody will be sufficient notice. The custody fees must be disallowed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Utah Liquor Control Commission v. Wooras
93 P.2d 455 (Utah Supreme Court, 1939)
The Condor
196 F. 71 (S.D. New York, 1912)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
12 F. Cas. 112, 1 Sprague 78, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/the-hibernia-mad-1844.