The Hertz Corporation v. Donald Cox and Sarah C. Crowe
This text of 436 F.2d 1376 (The Hertz Corporation v. Donald Cox and Sarah C. Crowe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC
The Petition for Rehearing is denied and no member of this panel nor Judge in regular active service on the Court having requested that the Court be polled on rehearing en banc, (Rule 35 Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure; Local Fifth Circuit Rule 12) the Petition for Rehearing En Banc is denied, 5 Cir., 430 F.2d 1365.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
436 F.2d 1376, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/the-hertz-corporation-v-donald-cox-and-sarah-c-crowe-ca5-1971.