The Harriet

E.D. Pennsylvania

The Harriet

11 F. Cas. 584, 1848 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 35

DecidedJuly 28, 1848

StatusPublished

This text of 11 F. Cas. 584 (The Harriet) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

The Harriet, 11 F. Cas. 584, 1848 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 35 (E.D. Pa. 1848).

Pincite

Opinion

Shipping — Average—Pout op Necessity — Measure of Damages — Authority of Master over Cargo — Freight.

1; The expenses and charges of going to a port of necessity are properly the subject of general average only where the voyage has been or might have been resumed; not where it has been abandoned, from necessity.

2. The ordinary measure of damages for the breach of a contract of affreightment, where the goods have been unlawfully disposed of at an intermediate port, is their prime cost, with interest, and charges of shipment and transportation.

3. The master has no authority to sell the cargo in order to make repairs, unless he be clearly unable to procure funds on the credit of the ship, or to hypothecate the cargo.

[Decided by Kane, District Judge. Cited in 1 Brightly, Dig. 69, 239, 7S7, and 792, to the points as stated above. Nowhere more fully reported; opinion not now accessible.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Shipping — Average—Pout op Necessity — Measure of Damages — Authority of Master over Cargo — Freight.

1; The expenses and charges of going to a port of necessity are properly the subject of general average only where the voyage has been or might have been resumed; not where it has been abandoned, from necessity.

2. The ordinary measure of damages for the breach of a contract of affreightment, where the goods have been unlawfully disposed of at an intermediate port, is their prime cost, with interest, and charges of shipment and transportation.

3. The master has no authority to sell the cargo in order to make repairs, unless he be clearly unable to procure funds on the credit of the ship, or to hypothecate the cargo.

[Decided by Kane, District Judge. Cited in 1 Brightly, Dig. 69, 239, 7S7, and 792, to the points as stated above. Nowhere more fully reported; opinion not now accessible.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

11 F. Cas. 584, 1848 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 35, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/the-harriet-paed-1848.