The Hadje
This text of 50 F. 225 (The Hadje) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Having found substantially the foregoing facts, the district court hold that it was not negligence to allow the betwcen-deek beams of the vessel to bo uncovered by a deck, or to use such beams for the stowage of loose planks for a temporary purpose, or to leave the ends of the loose deals unsupported at the place where the libelant fell; that the deals were not so placed as to justify the libel-ant in believing that he was proceeding upon a deck; and that the libel-ant used the deals for a purpose for which they were not intended, without necessity, and with fair notice, from the manner in which they lay, that they were not intended to be so used. In these views I concur, and it is not necessary further to enlarge upon them. The libel must be dismissed, with costs in both courts.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
50 F. 225, 19 Blatchf. 354, 1881 U.S. App. LEXIS 2661, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/the-hadje-circtedny-1881.